The Three Laws of Robotics Expanded

  1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
  2. A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
  3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

asimov.jpgBack in the heyday of science fiction there was a guy named Isaac Asimov. This was a while ago when sci-fi still had fresh ideas and wasn’t solely composed of soap operas in space (Star Trek) and fruity fantasy tales with wizards and magic (Star Wars.) Anyways, this Asimov guy wrote some pretty good books that, while excellent and revolutionary, do not translate well into modern pop culture (action packed thrill rides starring Will Smith going, “Aww, hell naw!”)

potter.jpgConsequently, lots of folks don’t know where much of our modern science fiction has its roots, especially when it comes to robotics. Mr. Asimov was smart enough to imagine that the creators of any sort of advanced artificially intelligent robot wouldn’t want to deal with the hassle of being blown into tiny meat chunks or thrown against a concrete wall as soon as they hit the power button on their newly crafted behemoth bristling with lasers and ungodly soulless strength. So he created a series of 3 laws to govern robot behavior that would be programmed into the computerized brain of the robot in order to keep those unfortunate rampages of mass destruction and death from even happening. That’s them up at the top of the update, straight from the source itself (Wikipedia.)

While those laws are fine and well, I think they are in need of a tune-up. Robotics has progressed by leaps and bounds since the 1940s, and this being the year 2008 robots are everywhere! Why your own parents could be robots and you wouldn’t even know it! Lets use the Three Laws as a starting point and expand on them from there to better suit the tastes of modern robotic lifestyles.

  1. irobot.jpgA robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
  2. A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
  3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
  4. A robot must work in a factory making automobile parts at least 23 hours a day, every day.
  5. A robot from Japan is REQUIRED to display one of the following characteristics: sickening cuteness, satisfaction of a weird sexual fetish, or total worthlessness. Bonus points given for combos.
  6. A robot struck by lightning is required to go completely haywire and begin an immediate killing rampage. Alternately it is to become self aware and lovable.
  7. pirateyoda.jpgA robot must have one of the following present at any given time: a ninja, a pirate, a zombie, a monkey, a viking, or Ron Paul. Uncreative internet comedians wouldn’t have it any other way.
  8. A robot must possess at least one awesome weapon, no exceptions. Acceptable are: lasers, buzz saws, grenade launchers, electrical arcs that crackle and snap, missile launchers, chain saws, chain guns, or a 2×4 with a nail through it.
  9. A robot capable of speech must use an overly synthetic or metallic sounding voice. It doesn’t matter what sound synthesis technology is like at the time, the robot has to sound like THE FUTURE.
  10. A robot may no longer play football in the NFL. We’ve lost too many promising athletes to plasma burns and decapitation this season.
  11. A robot may instead play Major League Baseball. The MLB is desperate to put the recent steroid debacle behind them, and robotic carnage and mayhem is just the ticket.
  12. bombsquad.jpgA robot working for the bomb squad is allowed to shed a single tear of lubricating motor oil as it is wheeled toward the suspicious package in the middle of the Carl’s Jr. parking lot.
  13. Any robot close to the “uncanny valley” is exempt from rule #3 and is required to immediately destroy itself.

uncannytitty.jpg

-Andy

email text

Slap one of these with your sausage fingers: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit

8 Responses to “The Three Laws of Robotics Expanded”


  1. 1 Jason - GorillaSushi

    And then there’s Johnny5 who breaks all the rules…

  2. 2 Andy

    I am all excited for the new pixar movie with the robot I think because the little guy reminds me of Johnny5 so much.

  3. 3 How2Blogger

    I don’t think my parents are robots, but I’ve long suspected that I might be one. Is there an easy way to tell without slicing through my forearm and peeling the skin back? I would hate to be wrong…

  4. 4 Andy

    Well, You could be a replicant from Blade Runner, a kind of bioengineered robot. The only way you can tell in that case is if you suddenly die after your 4 year lifespan is up.

    Otherwise you would know because of the constant whirring and clicking of gears and switches just under your skin. Also you would sound like an Austrian body builder.

  5. 5 Karen

    Why do the female robots have iron tipped nose cones for boobies? Are they ACTUAL iron tipped nose cones, constructed to annihilate mankind? In that case, what do the male robots have? Gigantic iron 12 inch perpetually hard penises…meant to lure all the female humans away? I think it might work. Yeah, I’m pretty sure.

  6. 6 Andy

    A better question is why do robots have gender at all? I am sure when the eventual war comes Terminator style and the robots have wiped out humanity they will look back at robo-boobs and see it as a degrading form of abuse. I have never seen a robo-dick before but then again I’ve never been to Japan.

  7. 7 Benjamin Wright

    As robots become more common, legal issues will arise. Contracts will be one tool for regulating robot bad behavior or unwanted spying.

  1. 1 Robotics » Blog Archive » ROBO EXPO 2008, NEW DELHI, INDIA

Leave a Reply